The stack frame is part of the stack which is managed by the current function and contains the data used by it.
The stack frame usually contains data such as:
Because the stack may change unpredictably during execution, the stack frame and its parts do not have a fixed address. Thus, IDA uses a pseudo structure to represent its layout. This structure is very similar to other structures in the Structures view, with a few differences:
To open the stack frame view:
In this view, you can perform most of the same operations as in the Structures view:
Consider this vulnerable program:
#include <stdio.h>
int main () {
char username[8];
int allow = 0;
printf external link("Enter your username, please: ");
gets(username); // user inputs "malicious"
if (grantAccess(username)) {
allow = 1;
}
if (allow != 0) { // has been overwritten by the overflow of the username.
privilegedAction();
}
return 0;
}
Source: CERN Computer Security
When compiled by an old GCC version, it might produce the following assembly:
.text:0000000000400580 main proc near ; DATA XREF: _start+1D↑o
.text:0000000000400580
.text:0000000000400580 var_10= byte ptr -10h
.text:0000000000400580 var_4= dword ptr -4
.text:0000000000400580
.text:0000000000400580 ; __unwind {
.text:0000000000400580 push rbp
.text:0000000000400581 mov rbp, rsp
.text:0000000000400584 sub rsp, 10h
.text:0000000000400588 mov [rbp+var_4], 0
.text:000000000040058F mov edi, offset format ; "Enter your username, please: "
.text:0000000000400594 mov eax, 0
.text:0000000000400599 call _printf
.text:000000000040059E lea rax, [rbp+var_10]
.text:00000000004005A2 mov rdi, rax
.text:00000000004005A5 call _gets
.text:00000000004005AA lea rax, [rbp+var_10]
.text:00000000004005AE mov rdi, rax
.text:00000000004005B1 call grantAccess
.text:00000000004005B6 test eax, eax
.text:00000000004005B8 jz short loc_4005C1
.text:00000000004005BA mov [rbp+var_4], 1
.text:00000000004005C1
.text:00000000004005C1 loc_4005C1: ; CODE XREF: main+38↑j
.text:00000000004005C1 cmp [rbp+var_4], 0
.text:00000000004005C5 jz short loc_4005D1
.text:00000000004005C7 mov eax, 0
.text:00000000004005CC call privilegedAction
.text:00000000004005D1
.text:00000000004005D1 loc_4005D1: ; CODE XREF: main+45↑j
.text:00000000004005D1 mov eax, 0
.text:00000000004005D6 leave
.text:00000000004005D7 retn
.text:00000000004005D7 ; } // starts at 400580
.text:00000000004005D7 main endp
On opening the stack frame we can see the following picture:
By comparing the source code and disassembly, we can infer that var_10 is username and var_4 is allow. Because the code only takes the address of start of the buffer, IDA could not detect its full size and created a single byte variable. To improve it, press * on var_10 and convert it into an array of 8 bytes. We can also rename the variables to their proper names.
Because IDA shows the stack frame layout in the natural memory order (addresses increase towards the bottom), we can immediately see the problem demonstrated by the vulnerable code: the gets function has no bounds checking, so entering a long string can overflow the username buffer and overwrite the allow variable. Since the code is only checking for a non-zero value, this will bypass the check and result in the execution of the privilegedAction function.
As mentioned above, in the stack frame view structure offsets are shown relative to the frame pointer. In some cases, like in the example above, it is an actual processor register (RBP). For example, the variable allow is placed at offset -4 from the frame pointer and this value is used by IDA in the disassembly listing for the symbolic name instead of raw numerical offset:
.text:0000000000400580 allow= dword ptr -4 [...] .text:0000000000400588 mov [rbp+allow], 0 [...]
By pressing # or K on the instruction, you can ask IDA to show you the instruction’s original form:
.text:0000000000400588 mov dword ptr [rbp-4], 0
Press K again to get back to the stack variable representation.
In other situations the frame pointer can be just an arbitrary location used for convenience (usually a fixed offset from the stack pointer value at function entry). This is common in binaries compiled with frame pointer omission, a common optimization technique. In such situation, IDA may use an extra delta to compensate for the stack pointer changes in different parts of function. For example, consider this function:
.text:10001030 sub_10001030 proc near ; DATA XREF: sub_100010B0:loc_100010E7↓o .text:10001030 .text:10001030 LCData= byte ptr -0Ch .text:10001030 var_4= dword ptr -4 .text:10001030 .text:10001030 sub esp, 0Ch .text:10001033 mov eax, dword_100B2960 .text:10001038 push esi .text:10001039 mov [esp+10h+var_4], eax .text:1000103D xor esi, esi .text:1000103F call ds:GetThreadLocale .text:10001045 push 7 ; cchData .text:10001047 lea ecx, [esp+14h+LCData] .text:1000104B push ecx ; lpLCData .text:1000104C push 1004h ; LCType .text:10001051 push eax ; Locale .text:10001052 call ds:GetLocaleInfoA .text:10001058 test eax, eax .text:1000105A jz short loc_1000107D .text:1000105C mov al, [esp+10h+LCData] .text:10001060 test al, al .text:10001062 lea ecx, [esp+10h+LCData] .text:10001066 jz short loc_1000107D
Here, the explicit frame pointer (ebp) is not used, and IDA arranges the stack frame so that the return address is placed offset 0:
-00000010 ; Frame size: 10; Saved regs: 0; Purge: 0 -00000010 ; -00000010 -00000010 db ? ; undefined -0000000F db ? ; undefined -0000000E db ? ; undefined -0000000D db ? ; undefined -0000000C LCData db ? -0000000B db ? ; undefined -0000000A db ? ; undefined -00000009 db ? ; undefined -00000008 db ? ; undefined -00000007 db ? ; undefined -00000006 db ? ; undefined -00000005 db ? ; undefined -00000004 var_4 dd ? +00000000 r db 4 dup(?) +00000004 +00000004 ; end of stack variables
To compensate for the changes of the stack pointer (sub esp, 0Ch and the push instructions), values 10h or 14h have to be added in the stack variable operands. Thanks to this, we can easily see that instructions at 10001047 and 1000105C refer to the same variable, even though in raw form they use different offsets ([esp+8] and [esp+4]).
Extra information: IDA Help: Stack Variables Window